Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 52
Filter
1.
BMC Endocr Disord ; 23(1): 100, 2023 May 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2312798

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Components of metabolic syndrome (MetS) was reported to contribute to severe and worse outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Hereby, we evaluated the association of MetS and its components with susceptibility to COVID-19. METHODS: Here, 1000 subjects with MetS were recruited that were diagnosed via the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criterion. Real-time PCR was exerted to detect SARS-CoV-2 in the nasopharyngeal swabs. RESULTS: Among the MetS patients, 206 (20.6%) cases were detected to have COVID-19. Smoking (OR = 5.04, 95%CI = 3.53-7.21, P < 0.0001) and CVD (OR = 1.62, 95%CI = 1.09-2.40, P = 0.015) were associated with increased chance of COVID-19 infection in the MetS patients. BMI was significantly higher (P = 0.0001) in MetS cases with COVID-19 than those without COVID-19. Obesity was associated with increased susceptibility to COVID-19 in MetS patients (OR = 2.00, 95%CI = 1.47-2.74, P < 0.0001). Total cholesterol, TG, LDL were significantly higher in the MetS cases with COVID-19 than those without COVID-19. Dyslipidemia was associated with increased chance of COVID-19 (OR = 1.50, 95%CI = 1.10-2.05, P = 0.0104). FBS level was significantly higher in the MetS cases with COVID-19. T2DM was associated with increased risk of COVID-19 in MetS patients (OR = 1.43, 95%CI = 1.01-2.00, P = 0.0384). Hypertension was associated with increased chance of COVID-19 in the MetS patients (OR = 1.44, 95%CI = 1.05-1.98, P = 0.0234). CONCLUSIONS: MetS and its components, like obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular complications were associated with increased chance of COVID-19 infection development and probably with aggravated symptoms in such patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dyslipidemias , Metabolic Syndrome , Humans , Metabolic Syndrome/complications , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Prevalence , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Risk Factors , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/complications
2.
Clin Mol Hepatol ; 29(Suppl): s86-s102, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2299507

ABSTRACT

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic liver disease characterized by excess fat accumulation in the liver. It is closely associated with metabolic syndrome, and patients with NAFLD often have comorbidities such as obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia. In addition to liver-related complications, NAFLD has been associated with a range of non-liver comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and sleep apnea. Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of mortality in patients with NAFLD, and patients with NAFLD have a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease than the general population. Chronic kidney disease is also more common in patients with NAFLD, and the severity of NAFLD is associated with a higher risk of developing chronic kidney disease. Sleep apnea, a disorder characterized by breathing interruptions during sleep, is also more common in patients with NAFLD and is associated with the severity of NAFLD. The presence of non-liver comorbidities in patients with NAFLD has important implications for the management of this disease. Treatment of comorbidities such as obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia may improve liver-related outcomes in patients with NAFLD. Moreover, treatment of non-liver comorbidities may also improve overall health outcomes in patients with NAFLD. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of the potential for non-liver comorbidities in patients with NAFLD and should consider the management of these comorbidities as part of the overall management of this disease.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Dyslipidemias , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Humans , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/complications , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/diagnosis , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Risk Factors , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Dyslipidemias/complications , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/complications
3.
J Korean Med Sci ; 38(13): e99, 2023 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2266369

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify the effect of histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use on the positivity rate and clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We performed a nationwide cohort study with propensity score matching using medical claims data and general health examination results from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Individuals aged ≥ 20 years who were tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) between 1 January and 4 June 2020 were included. Patients who were prescribed H2RA or PPI within 1 year of the test date were defined as H2RA and PPI users, respectively. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 test positivity, and the secondary outcome was the instance of severe clinical outcomes of COVID-19, including death, intensive care unit admission, and mechanical ventilation administration. RESULTS: Among 59,094 patients tested for SARS-CoV-2, 21,711 were H2RA users, 12,426 were PPI users, and 24,957 were non-users. After propensity score matching, risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was significantly lower in H2RA users (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.98) and PPI users (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52-0.74) compared to non-users. In patients with comorbidities including diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, the effect of H2RA and PPI against SARS-CoV-2 infection was not significant, whereas the protective effect was maintained in patients without such comorbidities. Risk of severe clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients showed no difference between users and non-users after propensity score matching either in H2RA users (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.52-1.54) or PPI users (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.60-2.51). CONCLUSION: H2RA and PPI use is associated with a decreased risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection but does not affect clinical outcome. Comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia seem to offset the protective effect of H2RA and PPI.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Dyslipidemias , Hypertension , Humans , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Histamine , Propensity Score , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Histamine H2 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/complications , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology
4.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 39(3): e3606, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2264101

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the sex-associated differences in the relationship between dyslipidemia and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibodies among BNT162b2 vaccine recipients. METHODS: Participants were staff members (aged 21-75 years) of a medical and research institution who underwent an anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibody test after the second (n = 1872) and third doses (n = 1075) of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Dyslipidemia was defined as triglyceride level ≥150 mg/dl, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol level <40 mg/dl, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol level ≥140 mg/dl, or lipid-lowering medication use. Multivariable linear regression was used to calculate the ratio of means for SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG titre according to dyslipidemia status. RESULTS: The prevalence of dyslipidemia was 38.0% in men and 19.6% in women. The relationship between dyslipidemia and SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG titres after the second dose differed markedly by sex (P for interaction <0.001). In men, dyslipidemia was associated with significantly lower IgG titres: the ratio of means (95% confidence interval) was 0.82 (0.72-0.93). However, this association disappeared after the third dose (0.96 [0.78-1.18]). Of the dyslipidemia components, hypertriglyceridemia was inversely associated with SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibody titre after both the second and third doses (ratio of means: 0.82 [0.70-0.95] and 0.73 [0.56-0.95], respectively). In women, IgG titres did not differ according to dyslipidemia or hypertriglyceridemia status after either dose. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a detrimental role of hypertriglyceridemia in the humoral immune response to the BNT162b2 vaccine for COVID-19 in men but not in women.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dyslipidemias , Hypertriglyceridemia , Vaccines , Male , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Antibodies, Viral , Health Personnel , Immunoglobulin G , Cholesterol
5.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol ; 11(2): 120-128, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2237145

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-clinical evidence and a few human studies with short follow-ups suggest increased risk of dyslipidaemia in the post-acute phase of COVID-19 (ie, >30 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection). However, detailed large-scale controlled studies with longer follow-ups and in-depth assessment of the risks and burdens of incident dyslipidaemia in the post-acute phase of COVID-19 are not yet available. We, therefore, aimed to examine the risks and 1-year burdens of incident dyslipidaemia in the post-acute phase of COVID-19 among people who survive the first 30 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: In this cohort study, we used the national health-care databases of the US Department of Veterans Affairs to build a cohort of 51 919 participants who had a positive COVID-19 test and survived the first 30 days of infection between March 1, 2020, and Jan 15, 2021; a non-infected contemporary control group (n=2 647 654) that enrolled patients between March 1, 2020, and Jan 15, 2021; and a historical control group (n=2 539 941) that enrolled patients between March 1, 2018, and Jan 15, 2019. Control groups had no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and participants in all three cohorts were free of dyslipidaemia before cohort enrolment. We then used inverse probability weighting using predefined and algorithmically-selected high dimensional variables to estimate the risks and 1-year burdens of incident dyslipidaemia, lipid-lowering medications use, and a composite of these outcomes. We reported two measures of risk: hazard ratios (HRs) and burden per 1000 people at 12 months. Additionally, we estimated the risks and burdens of incident dyslipidaemia outcomes in mutually exclusive groups based on the care setting of the acute infection (ie, participants who were non-hospitalised, hospitalised, or admitted to intensive care during the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection). FINDINGS: In the post-acute phase of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, compared with the non-infected contemporary control group, those in the COVID-19 group had higher risks and burdens of incident dyslipidaemia, including total cholesterol greater than 200 mg/dL (hazard ratio [HR] 1·26, 95% CI 1·22-1·29; burden 22·46, 95% CI 19·14-25·87 per 1000 people at 1 year), triglycerides greater than 150 mg/dL (1·27, 1·23-1·31; 22·03, 18·85-25·30), LDL cholesterol greater than 130 mg/dL (1·24, 1·20-1·29; 18·00, 14·98-21·11), and HDL cholesterol lower than 40 mg/dL (1·20, 1·16-1·25; 15·58, 12·52-18·73). The risk and burden of a composite of these abnormal lipid laboratory outcomes were 1·24 (95% CI 1·21-1·27) and 39·19 (95% CI 34·71-43·73), respectively. There was also increased risk and burden of incident lipid-lowering medications use (HR 1·54, 95% CI 1·48-1·61; burden 25·50, 95% CI 22·61-28·50). A composite of any dyslipidaemia outcome (laboratory abnormality or lipid-lowering medications use) yielded an HR of 1·31 (95% CI 1·28-1·34) and a burden of 54·03 (95% CI 49·21-58·92). The risks and burdens of these post-acute outcomes increased in a graded fashion corresponding to the severity of the acute phase of COVID-19 infection (ie, whether patients were non-hospitalised, hospitalised, or admitted to intensive care). The results were consistent in analyses comparing the COVID-19 group to the non-infected historical control group. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest increased risks and 1-year burdens of incident dyslipidaemia and incident lipid-lowering medications use in the post-acute phase of COVID-19 infection. Post-acute care for those with COVID-19 should involve attention to dyslipidaemia as a potential post-acute sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection. FUNDING: US Department of Veterans Affairs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dyslipidemias , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Cholesterol, HDL , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology
6.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(20)2022 Oct 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2071457

ABSTRACT

As the population recovers from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a subset of individuals is emerging as post-coronavirus disease (post-COVID) patients who experience multifactorial long-term symptoms several weeks after the initial recovery from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The aim of this systematic review is to present the latest scientific reports that evaluate changes in glucose levels, blood pressure readings and lipid profiles after recovery from COVID-19 to verify the hypothesis that new-onset diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and dyslipidaemia are a possible sequela of a COVID-19 infection. The open access databases PubMed and Google Scholar were searched. Articles investigating patients with residual clinical signs and biochemical alteration indicating diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia at least a month after recovering from COVID-19 were included. It has been shown that a select number of patients were diagnosed with new-onset diabetes, arterial hypertension and dyslipidaemia after COVID-19 infection. Alterations in glucose levels, blood pressure and lipid profiles months after initial infection shows the importance of considering diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and dyslipidaemia as part of the multifactorial diagnostic criteria post-COVID to better provide evidence-based clinical care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Dyslipidemias , Hypertension , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/etiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/etiology , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/etiology , Glucose , Lipids
7.
Cardiol J ; 29(5): 730-738, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2040289

ABSTRACT

Hypertension and lipid disorders are two of the main cardiovascular risk factors. Both risk factors - if detected early enough - can be controlled and treated with modern, effective drugs, devoid of significant side effects, available in four countries as different as Italy, Spain, Poland, and Uzbekistan. The aim herein, was to develop this TIMES TO ACT consensus to raise the awareness of the available options of the modern and intensified dyslipidemia and arterial hypertension treatments. The subsequent paragraphs involves consensus and discussion of the deleterious effects of COVID-19 in the cardiovascular field, the high prevalence of hypertension and lipid disorders in our countries and the most important reasons for poor control of these two factors. Subsequently proposed, are currently the most efficient and safe therapeutic options in treating dyslipidemia and arterial hypertension, focusing on the benefits of single-pill combination (SPCs) in both conditions. An accelerated algorithm is proposed to start the treatment with a PCSK9 inhibitor, if the target low-density-lipoprotein values have not been reached. As most patients with hypertension and lipid disorders present with multiple comorbidities, discussed are the possibilities of using new SPCs, combining modern drugs from different therapeutic groups, which mode of action does not confirm the "class effect". We believe our consensus strongly advocates the need to search for patients with cardiovascular risk factors and intensify their lipid-lowering and antihypertensive treatment based on SPCs will improve the control of these two basic cardiovascular risk factors in Italy, Spain, Poland and Uzbekistan.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases , Dyslipidemias , Hypertension , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Dyslipidemias/diagnosis , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Lipids , Lipoproteins , Poland , Proprotein Convertase 9 , Risk Factors
8.
Viruses ; 14(9)2022 09 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2010317

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Italy has witnessed high levels of COVID-19 deaths, mainly at the elderly age. We assessed the comorbidity and the biochemical profiles of consecutive patients ≤65 years of age to identify a potential risk profile for death. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from consecutive hospitalized-for-COVID-19 patients ≤65 years, who were died (593 patients) or discharged (912 patients) during February-December 2020. Multivariate logistic regression identified the mortality risk factors. RESULTS: Overweight (adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) 5.53, 95% CI 2.07-14.76), obesity (adjOR 8.58, CI 3.30-22.29), dyslipidemia (adjOR 10.02, 95% CI 1.06-94.22), heart disease (adjOR 17.68, 95% CI 3.80-82.18), cancer (adjOR 13.28, 95% CI 4.25-41.51) and male sex (adjOR 5.24, 95% CI 2.30-11.94) were associated with death risk in the youngest population. In the older population (46-65 years of age), the overweight and obesity were also associated with the death risk, however at a lower extent: the adjORs varyied from 1.49 to 2.36 for overweight patients and from 3.00 to 4.07 for obese patients. Diabetes was independently associated with death only in these older patients. CONCLUSION: Overweight, obesity and dyslipidemia had a pivotal role in increasing young individuals' death risk. Their presence should be carefully evaluated for prevention and/or prompt management of SARS-CoV2 infection in such high-risk patients to avoid the worst outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dyslipidemias , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Overweight/complications , Overweight/epidemiology , RNA, Viral , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 32(7): 1635-1641, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1914868

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Remdesivir (GS-5734), an inhibitor of the viral RNA-dependent, RNA polymerase was early identified as a promising therapeutic candidate against COVID-19. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of several metabolic parameters on Remdesivir effectiveness among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted an observational study on patients with SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia admitted between May 2020 and September 2021 to the COVID-19 Units of Internal Medicine, Pneumology and Intensive Care of Garibaldi Hospital, Catania, Italy, and treated with Remdesivir. The "Ordinal Scale For Clinical Improvement" was used to assess patients' clinical improvement within 28 days of hospitalization. Short-term mortality rate was also evaluated. A total of 142 patients with SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia were studied. The prevalence of obesity (20.7% vs. 41.9%, p = 0.03), the average BMI (27.1 ± 4.4 vs. 31.1 ± 6.1, p < 0.01) and the mean LDL-C levels (78 ± 19 mg/dl vs. 103 ± 18 mg/dl, p = 0.03) were significantly lower in early-improved (EI) compared to not-improved (NI) individuals. Obesity was negatively associated to clinical improvement after Remdesivir (OR 0.48, 95%CI 0.17-0.97, p = 0.04). Both obesity (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.05-7.71, p = 0.04) and dyslipidemia (OR 2.78, 95%CI 1.17-7.16, p = 0.03) were significantly related to patients' mortality. Dyslipidemic subjects experienced a slower clinical improvement than non-dyslipidemic ones (Long-Rank p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that unfavorable metabolic conditions such as obesity and dyslipidemia could predict a worse clinical response to Remdesivir as well as the mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Further prospective and larger-scale studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Dyslipidemias , Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Dyslipidemias/diagnosis , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Humans , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2
10.
J Clin Lipidol ; 16(5): 643-648, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1907223

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns for worsening cardiometabolic health in children. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent social restrictions on pediatric cardiometabolic health factors. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients in a pediatric lipid clinic in the year prior to (3/18/2019-3/17/2020) and during (3/18/2020-3/17/2021) the COVID-19 pandemic was performed. Physical findings (body mass index [BMI], waist circumference [WC], and blood pressure), laboratory markers of cardiometabolic health (lipid panel, insulin resistance, and liver transaminases), self-reported exercise time, and lipid-lowering medications (metformin, statin, omega-3 fatty acids, fenofibrate) were compared. RESULTS: 297 subjects met inclusion criteria. Among subjects prescribed no medications or on stable medication doses (n=241), there were few changes in lipid panels. Among subjects with new or increased medication doses between pre-pandemic and pandemic intervals (n=62), there were increases in triglycerides (p= 0.019) and HgbA1c (p=0.046). There was no change in z-scores for both BMI and WC for either group. CONCLUSION: We observed concerning trends in markers of cardiovascular disease health (dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and diabetes), independent of changes in weight, in at-risk children during the recent COVID pandemic. Our findings suggest that this vulnerable population may benefit from more frequent monitoring and intense management during such events.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases , Dyslipidemias , Insulin Resistance , Humans , Child , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Waist Circumference , Body Mass Index , Triglycerides , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Risk Factors
11.
Curr Diabetes Rev ; 18(9): e090222200945, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1686284

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, obesity, and dyslipidaemia are considered risk factors for more severe forms of COVID-19 infection. Statins have been widely used in such patients to prevent the occurrence of cardiovascular events and the associated mortality. However, statin use has been suggested to promote a more severe form of infection. This review aims to investigate the association between statin use and poor outcomes in COVID-19 patients with diabetes. METHODS: Literature search was performed in PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and pre-print databases (MedRxiv and BioRxiv), and studies published up to March 6th, 2021 have been reviewed. Selected studies were then assessed for risk of bias with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. RESULT: Four studies were included in the final analysis; all were retrospective studies. Two studies reported a decreased risk of mortality with statin use, while one study reported opposite findings. The other one did not find a significant association between statin use and poor COVID-19 outcomes. CONCLUSION: Available data suggest that statins may be safely administered to diabetic COVID-19 patients as the majority of evidence signifies statins to confer benefits and improve clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Dyslipidemias , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies
12.
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev ; 29(2): 91-102, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1638838

ABSTRACT

This executive document reflects and updates the key points of a Consensus document on Cardiovascular (CV) Prevention realized through the contribution of a number of Italian Scientific Societies and coordinated by the Italian Society of Cardiovascular Prevention (SIPREC). The aim of this executive document is to analyze and discuss the new recommendations introduced by international guidelines for the management of major CV risk factors, such as hypertension, dyslipidemias and type 2 diabetes, consisting in the identification of lower therapeutic targets, in the promotion of combination fixed drug therapies and in the introduction in routine clinical practice of new effective pharmacological classes. Moreover, the document highlights the importance of effective CV prevention strategies during the the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak which has dramatically changed the priorities and the use of available resources by the national healthcare systems and have caused a reduction of programmed follow-up visits and procedures and even of hospital admissions for severe acute pathologies. In addition, the pandemic and the consequent lockdown measures imposed have caused a widespread diffusion of unhealthy behaviors with detrimental effects on the CV system. In such a context, reinforcement of CV prevention activities may play a key role in reducing the future impact of these deleterious conditions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Dyslipidemias , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control , Dyslipidemias/diagnosis , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Humans
13.
Hematology ; 26(1): 1007-1012, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1555722

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Haematological markers such as absolute lymphopenia have been associated with severe COVID-19 infection. However, in the literature to date, the cohorts described have typically included patients who were moderate to severely unwell with pneumonia and who required intensive care stay. It is uncertain if these markers apply to a population with less severe illness. We sought to describe the haematological profile of patients with mild disease with COVID-19 admitted to a single centre in Singapore. METHODS: We examined 554 consecutive PCR positive SARS-COV-2 patients admitted to a single tertiary healthcare institution from Feb 2020 to April 2020. In all patients a full blood count was obtained within 24 h of presentation. RESULTS: Patients with pneumonia had higher neutrophil percentages (66.5 ± 11.6 vs 55.2 ± 12.6%, p < 0.001), lower absolute lymphocyte count (1.5 ± 1.1 vs 1.9 ± 2.1 x109/L, p < 0.011) and absolute eosinophil count (0.2 ± 0.9 vs 0.7 ± 1.8 × 109/L, p = 0.002). Platelet counts (210 ± 56 vs 230 ± 61, p = 0.020) were slightly lower in the group with pneumonia. We did not demonstrate significant differences in the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in patients with or without pneumonia. Sixty-eight patients (12.3%) had peripheral eosinophilia. This was more common in migrant workers living in dormitories. CONCLUSION: Neutrophilia and lymphopenia were found to be markers associated with severe COVID-19 illness. We did not find that combined haematological parameters: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio, had any association with disease severity in our cohort of patients with mild-moderate disease. Migrant workers living in dormitories had eosinophilia which may reflect concurrent chronic parasitic infection.


Subject(s)
Blood Cell Count , COVID-19/blood , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Eosinophilia/epidemiology , Eosinophilia/etiology , Female , Fever/epidemiology , Fever/etiology , Housing , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypoxia/epidemiology , Hypoxia/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neutrophils , Parasitic Diseases/drug therapy , Parasitic Diseases/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Singapore/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Travel-Related Illness , Young Adult , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
14.
Lipids Health Dis ; 20(1): 141, 2021 Oct 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1484314

ABSTRACT

The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus started in March 2020. The conclusions from numerous studies indicate that people with comorbidities, such as arterial hypertension, diabetes, obesity, underlying cardiovascular disease, are particularly vulnerable to the severe course of COVID-19. The available data also suggest that patients with dyslipidemia, the most common risk factor of cardiovascular diseases, are also at greater risk of severe course of COVID-19. On the other hand, it has been shown that COVID-19 infection has an influence on lipid profile leading to dyslipidemia, which might require appropriate treatment. Owing to antiviral, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and cardioprotective activity, statin therapy has been considered as valuable tool to improve COVID-19 outcomes. Numerous observational studies have shown potential beneficial effects of lipid-lowering treatment on the course of COVID-19 with significant improved prognosis and reduced mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/etiology , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/drug therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/epidemiology , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/metabolism , Lipid Metabolism , Prognosis , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
15.
J Diabetes Complications ; 35(12): 108054, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1440173

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Obese patients with respiratory failure need more intensive care and invasive mechanical ventilation than their non-obese counterparts. We aimed to evaluate the impact of body mass index and obesity related conditions on fatal outcome during a hospitalization for COVID-19. METHODS: From March 1 to April 30, 2020, 425 consecutive patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 were hospitalized at University Medical Center, in New Orleans. Clinical variables, comorbidities, and hospital course were extracted from electronic medical records. Special attention was given to obesity related conditions like hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Severe obesity was defined as a body mass index ≥35-<40 kg/m2 and morbid obesity as body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. Risk of mortality was determined by applying multivariate binary logistic regression modeling to risk factor variables (age, sex, race, and Charlson comorbid score). RESULTS: Patients were mostly African American (77.9%) and 51.0% were women. Age and Charlson comorbidity index scores averaged 60 (50-71 years) and 3.0 (1.25-5), respectively. In-hospital mortality was greater in morbidly obese than non-morbidly obese patients. Of the 64 severely obese patients, 16 had no obesity related conditions, and 48 had at least one obesity related condition: hypertension (60%), type 2 diabetes mellitus (28%), and dyslipidemia (20%). In-hospital mortality was greater in severely obese patients with than without at least one obesity related condition. CONCLUSION: During a hospitalization for COVID-19, severely obese patients with at least one obesity related condition and morbidly obese patients have a high mortality.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , COVID-19/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Aged , COVID-19/complications , Comorbidity , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , New Orleans/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Blood Cells Mol Dis ; 92: 102604, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1401241

ABSTRACT

Patients with COVID-19 can be asymptomatic or present mild to severe symptoms, leading to respiratory and cardiovascular complications and death. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity are considered risk factors for COVID-19 poor prognosis. In parallel, COVID-19 severe patients exhibit dyslipidemia and alterations in neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) associated with disease severity and mortality. To investigate whether such alterations are caused by the infection or results from preexisting comorbidities, this work analyzed dyslipidemia and the hemogram profile of COVID-19 patients according to the severity and compared with patients without T2DM or obesity comorbidities. Dyslipidemia, with a marked decrease in HDL levels, and increased NLR accompanied the disease severity, even in non-T2DM and non-obese patients, indicating that COVID-19 causes the observed alterations. Because decreased hemoglobin is involved in COVID-19 severity, and hemoglobin concentration is associated with metabolic diseases, the erythrogram of patients was also evaluated. We verified a drop in hemoglobin and erythrocyte number in severe patients, independently of T2DM and obesity, which may explain in part the need for artificial ventilation in severe cases. Thus, the control of such parameters (especially HDL levels, NLR, and hemoglobin concentration) could be a good strategy to prevent COVID-19 complications and death.


Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis/etiology , COVID-19/complications , Dyslipidemias/etiology , Leukocyte Count , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Aged , Anemia/epidemiology , Anemia/etiology , Atherosclerosis/epidemiology , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/therapy , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Erythrocyte Count , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Hypoxia/etiology , Hypoxia/therapy , Lipoproteins, HDL/blood , Lymphocyte Count , Middle Aged , Neutrophils , Obesity/epidemiology , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
17.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 12: 688071, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1399132

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection continues to scale and threaten human health and public safety. It is essential to identify those risk factors that lead to a poor prognosis of the disease. A predisposing host genetic background could be one of these factors that explain the interindividual variability to COVID-19 severity. Thus, we have studied whether the rs4341 and rs4343 polymorphisms of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene, key regulator of the renin-aldosterone-angiotensin system (RAAS), could explain the different outcomes of 128 COVID-19 patients with diverse degree of severity (33 asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, 66 hospitalized in the general ward, and 29 admitted to the ICU). We found that G allele of rs4341 and rs4343 was associated with severe COVID-19 in hypertensive patients, independently of gender (p<0.05). G-carrier genotypes of both polymorphisms were also associated with higher mortality (p< 0.05) and higher severity of COVID-19 in dyslipidemic (p<0.05) and type 2 diabetic patients (p< 0.01). The association of G alleles with disease severity was adjusted for age, sex, BMI and number of comorbidities, suggesting that both the metabolic comorbidities and the G allele act synergistically on COVID-19 outcome. Although we did not find a direct association between serum ACE levels and COVID-19 severity, we found higher levels of ACE in the serum of patients with the GG genotype of rs4341 and rs4343 (p<0.05), what could explain the higher susceptibility to develop severe forms of the disease in patients with the GG genotype, in addition to hypertension and dyslipidemia. In conclusion, our preliminary study suggests that the G-containing genotypes of rs4341 and rs4343 confer an additional risk of adverse COVID-19 prognosis. Thus, rs4341 and rs4343 polymorphisms of ACE could be predictive markers of severity of COVID-19 in those patients with hypertension, dyslipidemia or diabetes. The knowledge of these genetic data could contribute to precision management of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients when admitted to hospital.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/genetics , Diabetes Mellitus/genetics , Dyslipidemias/genetics , Genetic Variation/genetics , Hypertension/genetics , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/diagnosis , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Spain/epidemiology
18.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 8(1)2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1315812

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have reported an association between atherosclerosis-related diseases and COVID-19, the relationship between COVID-19 severity and atherosclerosis progression remains unclear. The aim of this study is to determine the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) prognostic value in patients with COVID-19 using indices such as deterioration in oxygenation and CT images of the chest. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study of 53 consecutive patients with COVID-19 in Narita who were admitted to our hospital between March 2020 and August 2020. CACS was calculated based on non-gated CT scans of the chest performed on admission day. The patients were divided into the following two groups based on CACS: group 1 (CACS ≥180, n=11) and group 2 (CACS <180, n=42). Following univariate analysis of the main variables, multivariate analysis of variables that may be associated with COVID-19 progression was performed. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis of age, sex, smoking history, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, number of days from symptom onset to hospitalisation and CACS of ≥180 was performed. It revealed that unlike CACS of <180, CACS of ≥180 is associated with exacerbation of oxygenation or CT images of the chest during hospitalisation (OR: 12.879, 95% CI: 1.399 to 380.401). Furthermore, this model of eight variables showed good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p=0.119). CONCLUSION: CACS may be a prognosis marker of COVID-19 severity. Although coronary artery calcification is not typically assessed in pneumonia cases, it may provide a valuable clinical indicator for predicting severe COVID-19 outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/physiopathology , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Disease Progression , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Smoking/epidemiology , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Vascular Calcification/epidemiology
19.
Diabetes Care ; 44(9): 2149-2157, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1308250

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Identifying metabolic factors associated with critical disease can help to improve management of patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). High triglycerides and low HDL levels characterize the atherogenic dyslipidemia closely related to insulin resistance and diabetes. We examined associations of atherogenic dyslipidemia detected on admission with outcome of COVID-19 during hospitalization. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical reports of 118 consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in Rome, Italy, between March and May 2020. Clinical characteristics, inflammation markers, and glucose and lipid metabolism parameters at admission were collected. Critical disease was defined as in-hospital death or need for endotracheal intubation. Associations were tested using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with critical COVID-19 (n = 43) were significantly older than those with noncritical disease (n = 75) and presented higher levels of fasting glucose, triglycerides, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, procalcitonin, and d-dimer (P < 0.01 for all), whereas HDL levels were lower (P = 0.003). Atherogenic dyslipidemia was more frequent in patients with critical COVID-19 (46 vs. 24%, P = 0.011), as well as diabetes (37 vs. 19%, P = 0.026), and significantly associated with death or intubation (odds ratio 2.53 [95% CI 1.16-6.32], P = 0.018). Triglycerides were significantly associated with selected inflammatory biomarkers (P < 0.05 for all) and poorer outcome of COVID-19 during hospitalization in both the overall population and the subgroup with atherogenic dyslipidemia. CONCLUSIONS: Atherogenic dyslipidemia detected on admission can be associated with critical in-hospital course of COVID-19. Further investigations are needed to elucidate the hypothetical role of insulin resistance and related lipid abnormalities in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pathogenesis. Assessment of lipid profile should be encouraged in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Dyslipidemias , Dyslipidemias/complications , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
20.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 12: 611526, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1305635

ABSTRACT

Background: It has been reported that dyslipidemia is related to coronavirus-related diseases. Critical patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who suffered from multiple organ dysfunctions were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) in Wuhan, China. Whether the lipids profile was associated with the prognosis of COVID-19 in critical patients remained unclear. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in critical patients (N=48) with coronavirus disease 2019 in Leishenshan hospital between February and April 2020 in Wuhan. The parameters including lipid profiles, liver function, and renal function were collected on admission day, 2-3days after the admission, and the day before the achievement of clinical outcome. Results: Albumin value and creatine kinase (ck) value were statistically decreased at 2-3 days after admission compared with those on admission day (P<0.05). Low density lipoprotein (LDL-c), high density lipoprotein (HDL-c), apolipoprotein A (ApoA), and apolipoprotein A (Apo B) levels were statistically decreased after admission (P<0.05). Logistic regression showed that HDL-c level both on admission day and the day before the achievement of clinical outcome were negatively associated with mortality in critical patients with COVID-19. Total cholesterol (TC) level at 2-3days after admission was related to mortality in critical patients with COVID-19. Conclusions: There were lipid metabolic disorders in the critical patients with COVID-19. Lower levels of HDL-c and TC were related to the progression of critical COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Multiple Organ Failure/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Apolipoproteins A/blood , Apolipoproteins B/blood , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Cholesterol/blood , Cholesterol, HDL/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Critical Illness , Dyslipidemias/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Organ Failure/blood , Multiple Organ Failure/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL